Schools by area › Highland › Farr Primary School - Bettyhill
Farr Primary School - Bettyhill
Primary · Ages 3–11 · Council school
Bettyhill, By Thurso KW14 7SS · farrsutherland.wordpress.com · 01641 521217
On the mapSearch near KW14 7SS
Overview
- Pupils
- 30
- September 2025 census
- Local authority
- Highland
- Departments
- Pre-school, Primary
- Denomination
- Non-denominational
- Medium of education
- English medium
- Teachers
- 2.8
- Full-time equivalent
- Pupils per teacher
- 10.7
- Average class size
- 15
- Additional support needs
- 8 pupils (27%)
- English as an additional language
- 0 pupils (0%)
- Taught in Gaelic
- 30 pupils (100%)
- Gaelic medium or learner
- Free school meals, P1 to P5
- 100% (18 pupils)
- Most deprived areas
- 0%
- Most deprived fifth (SIMD)
From the Scottish Government’s school contact details, school level summary statistics and School Roll and Locations.
Inspection
Education Scotland’s latest graded inspection on file (full inspection, report published 21 January 2025) graded it 1 to 6 on each quality indicator: Leadership of change 3 (satisfactory); Learning, teaching and assessment 3 (satisfactory); Raising attainment and achievement 3 (satisfactory); Ensuring wellbeing, equality and inclusion 3 (satisfactory). Nursery class: Leadership of change 5 (very good); Learning, teaching and assessment 5 (very good); Securing children’s progress 5 (very good); Ensuring wellbeing, equality and inclusion 5 (very good).
- Report published
- 21 Jan 2025
- Full inspection · Education Scotland
Quality indicators
| Leadership of change | 3 · Satisfactory |
|---|---|
| Learning, teaching and assessment | 3 · Satisfactory |
| Raising attainment and achievement | 3 · Satisfactory |
| Ensuring wellbeing, equality and inclusion | 3 · Satisfactory |
Nursery class
| Leadership of change | 5 · Very good |
|---|---|
| Learning, teaching and assessment | 5 · Very good |
| Securing children’s progress | 5 · Very good |
| Ensuring wellbeing, equality and inclusion | 5 · Very good |
Previously: inspection, Nov 2008
Earlier inspections
Before October 2016
Nov 2008Inspection
Improvements in performance 2 · Weak Learners’ experiences 3 · Satisfactory Meeting learning needs 2 · Weak The curriculum 2 · Weak Improvement through self-evaluation 2 · Weak